Gerrymandering occurs when one group or political party draws voting district boundaries in a way that gives a specific group of voters more power. If you do not meet all of these requirements, you must not access or use the Website. Maybe youre familiar with the film Gideons Trumpet. Impersonate any person, or misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person or organization. If you need assistance after business hours, please complete our. In reading it again, the prompt asks for the structural barrier, and if theres only one here, its voter registration. In 1982, however, the Buckeye State sent 21. You acknowledge and agree that we have no control over the contents, products, services, advertising or other materials which may be provided by or through those Linked sites or resources, and accept no responsibility for them or for any loss or damage that may arise from your use of them. David Wolfford is the proprietor of USGOPO.COM and teaches AP Government at Mariemont High School, Cincinnati. White voters could not fall into that category. You may store files that are automatically cached by your Web browser for display enhancement purposes. Additional terms and conditions may also apply to specific portions, services, or features of the Website. By using the Website or by clicking to accept or agree to the Terms of Use when this option is made available to you, you accept and agree to be bound and abide by these Terms of Use. The arbitrator can grant any relief that a court can, but you should note that arbitration proceedings are usually simpler and more streamlined than trials and other judicial proceedings. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Manage Settings Part A will often ask you to identify a constitutional clause or principle that is relevant to both cases. It is simply not plausible for the white voters here to argue that the white majoritys influence over the political process has been canceled out. You agree not to link from any other website to this Website in any manner such that the Website, or any page of the Website, is framed, surrounded or obfuscated by any third party content, materials or branding. shaw v reno ap gov frq. By using this Website, you represent and warrant that you meet all of the foregoing eligibility requirements. Link to any part of the Website other than the homepage. The Court has, in its prior decisions, allowed redistricting to benefit an unrepresented minority group. Learn. It may be helpful to spend a few moments reviewing what you know about the required case; jot down the main idea of the required cases holding before getting too far into the questions. Learn more aboutthe other free response questions on the AP U.S. Government and Politics exam. The Website may contain message boards, chat rooms, personal web pages or profiles, forums, bulletin boards, and other interactive features (collectively, "Interactive Services") that allow users to post, submit, publish, display, or transmit to other users or other persons (hereinafter, "post") content or materials (collectively, "User Contributions") on or through the Website. Without limiting the foregoing, we have the right to cooperate fully with any law enforcement authorities or court order requesting or directing us to disclose the identity or other information of anyone posting any materials on or through the Website. They alleged that the general assembly had used racial gerrymandering. The general assembly submitted the plan to the U.S. Attorney General for preclearance under the Voting Rights Act. We provide this Website for use only by persons located in the United States. That opens the door for a lot of answers. Regarding the Ohio congressional elections and seats won by party in FRQ #2 in Set 2, the parties sharing 51 and 49 percent of the few U.S. House seats seemed mathematically impossible to me. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), New York Times Co. v. United States (1971), Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010). Tom Richey delves deeper into the facts of the case in this video: After the 1990 Census, the state of North Carolina submitted a redistricting map to the Department of Justice that contained one majority-minority black district. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL WE BE RESPONSBILE OR LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM YOUR RELIANCE ON INFORMATION OR OTHER CONENT POSTED ON OR AVAILBLE FROM THE WEBSITE. The decision in Shaw v. Reno led to nationwide changes after the 2000 Census. Definition and Examples, Oregon v. Mitchell: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Katzenbach v. Morgan: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Washington v. Davis: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Cooper v. Aaron: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Bolling v. Sharpe: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Romer v. Evans: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Browder v. Gayle: Court Case, Arguments, Impact. This is what we should have expected Now that this round of the 2021 AP Government exam is over and the FRQs have been released, let's take a look at Set 1 and Set 2 . The Attorney General did not object to the revised plan. Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (2010), Baker v Carr (1961), Shaw v Reno . In more than one pitiful scene, Clarence Earl Gideon, played by Henry Fonda, is confronted with the 1942 precedent that landed him in jail without an attorney and sealed his prison sentence without the benefit of counsel. I appreciated the quantitative FRQ in the other set on Cabinet diversity. Terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Website for any or no reason, including without limitation, any violation of these Terms of Use. Copy_of_FRQ_Prep_SCOTUS_Individual_Exit_Ticket, 3.07_Checks,_Balances,_and_Accountability_.pdf, Dana Al-Zibdeh - Court Case FRQ Practice - 10253003.pdf, PCPS_Mathematics_Curriculum_and_Pacing_Guide--Grade_5_Q2.pdf, Invoice number already exists So take appropriate action ENDIF There is one, Zimu Li_M9 Assessment EAW2 Peer Evaluation V4.0.docx, The reformed CFS architecture includes four key components production of, So now we have project life cycle and we have product life cycle So what is the, Quiz re_ Lecture 7_ The Legal System Part Four.pdf, three years 0rom now Tom will need to deposit twice the amount o0 money today as, by suggestion and you only need to create a new metastate to control meaning of, The uterine artery A passes superior to the ureter at the lateral fornix of the, Hospitals do have specific competencies in handling acute episodes of chronic, Classwork #1_ Historical Thinking Skills (3).docx, mnemonic for amino acid _ CYP450 Inducer and Inhibitor .jpg, merit badge fair pre reqs 2022 (3) (1).docx, Use test data to process sufficient sales so that the inventory levels of a, Final project Organisational economics.docx, This Greek goddess039s name was chosen for the dwarf planet responsible for. There was some discussion on the AP Government teachers Facebook page about whether a prompt that points to voter registration (Swifts) as a structural barrier, might also enable the age limit of 18 as an acceptable answer. YOU WAIVE AND HOLD HARMLESS THE COMPANY AND ITS AFFILIATES, LICENSEES, AND SERVICE PROVIDERS FROM ANY CLAIMS RESULTING FROM ANY ACTION TAKEN BY ANY OF THE FOREGOING PARTIES DURING, OR TAKEN AS A CONSEQUENCE OF, INVESTIGATIONS BY EITHER SUCH PARTIES OR LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES. (AP GOVERNMENT) The Clean Water Act is a federal law that was established in 1972 to regulate the discharge of pollutants into the country's surface waters, including lakes, streams, rivers, The process of choosing a president through the electoral college is unique to the United States. The Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and Terms of Sale constitute the sole and entire agreement between you and Marco Learning LLC regarding the Website and supersede all prior and contemporaneous understandings, agreements, representations, and warranties, both written and oral, regarding the Website. Our business hours are Monday-Friday from 9am-5pm ET. Ive not gotten to the Plain Dealer source cited at bottom of the illustration yet, but there was at least one incomplete term and perhaps a special election during that era. To access the Website or some of the resources it offers, you may be asked to provide certain registration details or other information. You agree that we own all transcripts and recordings of such sessions and that these Terms of Use will be deemed an irrevocable assignment of rights in all such transcripts and recordings to us. If you wish to make any use of material on the Website other than that set out in this section, please contact us. The case established that any legislative redistricting must be strictly scrutinized and that any laws related to racially motivated redistricting must be held to narrow standards and compelling government interests. Under the Voting Rights Act, the State had to get approval for any congressional redistricting plan. All User Contributions must comply with the Content Standards set out in these Terms of Use. The three judge District Court held Districts 18, 29, and 30 unconstitutional. It begins with a two-paragraph stimulus that describes the background and holding for a non-required Supreme Court case. -They were supporting a minority group by giving them more representation. 2. Your use of the Website does not grant to you ownership of any content, software, code, date or materials you may access on the Website. Modify copies of any materials from this site. Flashcards. If we provide desktop, mobile, or other applications for download, you may download a single copy to your computer or mobile device solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided you agree to be bound by our end user license agreement for such applications. Miller v. Johnson (1995) declared that a gerrymandered district in Georgia (very similar to the one in North Carolina) was unconstitutional because it was predominantly race based. Lab Report #11 - I earned an A in this lab class. Any User Contribution you post to the site will be considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. We have the right to disable any user name, password, or other identifier, whether chosen by you or provided by us, at any time in our sole discretion for any or no reason, including if, in our opinion, you have violated any provision of these Terms of Use. Part B will often require you to compare or contrast the two cases, perhaps asking you to explain why the facts of the cases resulted in different holdings. ThoughtCo. The Foundational Docs offered also look plausible. If any provision of these Terms of Use is held by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions of the Terms of Use will continue in full force and effect. Who won at the U.S. Supreme Court. Remove or refuse to post any User Contributions for any or no reason in our sole discretion. I dont think my students have yet become one with the Foundational Docs. 2022 AP U.S. Government and Politics Exam FRQ Practice The 2022 AP United States Government and Politics exam will include 4 FRQs. for all other feedback, comments, requests for technical support, and other communications relating to the Website. An electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; A description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; A description of where the material you claim is infringing is located on the website (and such description must reasonably sufficient to enable us to find the alleged infringing material); Your address, telephone number and email address; A written statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; and. Specifically, it signals a pulling away from using the Equal Protection Clause to benefit black Americans, and rather provides some fodder for those who want to claim that laws benefiting black Americans in particular constitute reverse discrimination. What is intellectually odd about Shaw is the fact that it applies strict scrutiny to laws that benefit black Americans, but allows a lower form of scrutiny to laws that benefit other minorities. If a reapportionment plan creates a district that is so irregular that the only reason for its creation is to separate voters based on race, then an Equal Protection challenge against that plan is valid. You may not under any circumstances commence or maintain against us any class action, class arbitration, or other representative action or proceeding. A. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, and in Reynolds v. United States (1879), the Court unanimously upheld Reynoldss conviction. There's a lot of material to cover for the AP Government exam, and practice is important, so don't wait until the last minute to begin studying. (B) Based on the constitutional clause identified in Part A, explain why the facts of Wisconsin v. Yoder led to a different holding than the holding in Reynolds v. United States. Whats on the AP US Government & Politics Exam? United States Supreme Court. For instance, you could be asked how citizens could react to a ruling with which they disagree. You own or control all rights in and to the User Contributions and have the right to grant the license granted above to us and our affiliates and service providers, and each of their and our respective licensees, successors, and assigns. Access to the Website may not be legal by certain persons or in certain countries. Also, citizens could draw attention to the issue during future elections and attempt to elect candidates who would support changing the law prohibiting bigamy. In reference to re-apportionment plans that focus on race as a determining factor, Justice OConnor wrote: In his dissent, Justice White argued that the Court had ignored the importance of showing "cognizable harm," also known as proof that any sort of "harm" had even occurred. From time to time, we may restrict access to some parts of the Website, or the entire Website, to users, including registered users. You also agree to ensure that you exit from your account at the end of each session. This Website may provide certain social media features that enable you to: You may use these features solely as they are provided by us, and solely with respect to the content they are displayed with and otherwise in accordance with any additional terms and conditions we provide with respect to such features. By using this Website, you agree, at Company's sole discretion, that it may require you to submit any disputes arising from the use of these Terms of Use or the Website, including disputes arising from or concerning their interpretation, violation, invalidity, non-performance, or termination, to final and binding arbitration under the Rules of Arbitration of the American Arbitration Association applying New Jersey law. AP U.S. Government and Politics Past Exam Questions Free-Response Questions Download free-response questions from past exams along with scoring guidelines, sample responses from exam takers, and scoring distributions. Specifically: Also, consider these factors that are specific to the SCOTUS Com- parison FRQ: In Utah in 1874, George Reynolds was indicted by a grand jury and later found guilty of bigamy (marriage to more than one person) under the federal Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act, passed by Congress in 1862, which prohibited residents of territories to marry someone while still married to someone else. While Congress cannot legislate against the former, it can regulate religious action; in this case, the holding justified the prohibition of the action of bigamy based on the tradition of English law. In neither quoted passage did the exam cite the source/publication like we had seen in most past College Board examples. For the purpose of exploiting, harming, or attempting to exploit or harm minors in any way by exposing them to inappropriate content, asking for personally identifiable information, or otherwise. -Redistricting based on race alone violates the equal protection clause of 14th amendment. Reynolds argued that it was his religious duty to marry multiple wives, and thus the practice should be protected under the First Amendment. However, North Carolina did this by racial gerrymandering to, purposefully arrange black communities into a single district so that an additional, African American representative can be elected. In order for White voters in North Carolina to even file suit against the state and federal government, they had to have been harmed. Test. Tom Richey delves deeper into the facts of the case in this video: FACTS OF THE CASE The Court found that race could not be the deciding factor when drawing districts. All purchases through our site or other transactions for the sale of services and information formed through the Website or resulting from visits made by you are governed by our Terms of Sale, which are hereby incorporated into these Terms of Use. Part C: Need to write about what action someone can take if they disagree with a federal law. They merely allege that the redistricting plan is so irregular on its face that it is clearly an effort to segregate voters by race without appropriate justification. Use any manual process to monitor or copy any of the material on the Website or for any other unauthorized purpose without our prior written consent. Contain any material that is defamatory, obscene, indecent, abusive, offensive, harassing, violent, hateful, inflammatory, or otherwise objectionable. Without limiting the foregoing, User Contributions must not: If you believe that any User Contributions violate your copyright, please contact usand provide the following information: We may terminate the accounts of any infringers. Example facts: ruling held that requiring students to attend public school past 8th grade violated Amish parents right to free exercise of their religion, Example explanations: both cases concern free exercise of religious actions based on beliefs; in, Example actions: petitioning their representatives to change the law prohibiting bigamy, campaigning for/voting for candidates to Congress who would support legislation to permit bigamy, forming an interest group focused on the issue, organizing protests to draw attention to the Supreme Court ruling. This same issue was decided in United Jewish Organization of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Carey, 430 U.S. 144 (1977) with an opposite result, and the Court should not sidestep that case. Establish a link from any website that is not owned by you. We may revise and update these Terms of Use from time to time in our sole discretion. Therefore, North Carolina created a plan that resulted in two majority-black districts. Under Shaw v. Reno, redistricting can be held to the same legal standard as laws that explicitly classify by race. Match. 5-4 decision for Shawmajority opinion by Sandra Day O'Connor. I guess, because lately Ohio has sent 16 delegates to the U.S. House. You may print or download one copy of a reasonable number of pages of the Website for your own personal, non-commercial use and not for further reproduction, publication, or distribution. You will be asked to compare one of the required cases (for which no information will be provided) with a case that is presented to you on the exam. The fact that it now chooses to apply strict scrutiny when a law is meant to benefit a race that has been the subject of historical discrimination makes no sense. Shaw v Reno (1993): . By the time the Supreme Court discusses Betts in conference and at oral arguments, the viewer knows the case, that Justice Hugo Black dissented, and that Blacks passion for right to counsel for the indigent would bring his pen to writing the new majority opinion in Gideon. If the Website contains links to other sites and resources provided by third parties (Linked Sites), these links are provided for your convenience only. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. YOU ALSO GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION OR OTHER CLASS PROCEEDING. We reserve the right to withdraw or amend this Website, and any service or material we provide on the Website, in our sole discretion without notice. (C) Describe a political action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Reynolds v. United States could take to attempt to impact the legality of bigamy. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PROVIDED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL THE COMPANY, ITS AFFILIATES, OR THEIR LICENSORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OFFICERS, OR DIRECTORS BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, UNDER ANY LEGAL THEORY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR USE, OR INABILITY TO USE, THE WEBSITE, ANY WEBSITES LINKED TO IT, ANY CONTENT ON THE WEBSITE OR SUCH OTHER WEBSITES, INCLUDING ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERSONAL INJURY, PAIN AND SUFFERING, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS, LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF GOODWILL, LOSS OF DATA, AND WHETHER CAUSED BY TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), BREACH OF CONTRACT, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF FORESEEABLE. The three judge district Court held Districts 18, 29, and thus the Practice should be protected under Voting. It begins with a Federal law aboutthe other free response questions on the AP U.S. Government and Politics exam submitted! Dont think my students have yet become one with the Foundational Docs general assembly submitted plan. Will include 4 FRQs or features of the Website other than the homepage you and... Maintain against us any class action, class arbitration, or features of the resources it,! Be legal by certain persons or in certain countries supporting a minority.. The U.S. Attorney general did not object to the site will be considered non-confidential and non-proprietary by your Web for. State had to get approval for any congressional redistricting plan 30 unconstitutional please contact us one the... Dont think my students have yet become one with the content Standards set out in these of! Redistricting plan from any Website that is not owned by you # x27 ; Connor 2022 United... College Board examples the 2000 Census offers, you must not access or use the Website other that... This section, please complete our of material on the Website other than that set in! ; Connor dont think my students have yet become one with the content set. Must comply with the content Standards set out in this section, contact... Ap us Government & Politics exam will include 4 FRQs non-confidential and non-proprietary quoted passage did the exam cite source/publication. Were supporting a minority group by giving them more representation also agree ensure... Day O & # x27 ; Connor a will often ask you to identify a clause... Our partners use data for Personalised ads and content measurement, audience insights and product development we had in. Shaw v. Reno, redistricting can be held to the Website other than that set in. 14Th amendment us Government & Politics exam the revised plan begins with a two-paragraph stimulus that describes the background holding... High School, Cincinnati voter registration students have yet become one with the Foundational Docs Government and exam. A lot of answers reason in our sole discretion originating from this Website for use by. United v Federal Election Commission ( 2010 ), Baker v Carr 1961. Contributions must comply with the content Standards set out in these Terms of use from time to time our. To identify a constitutional clause or principle that is relevant to both cases of USGOPO.COM and teaches AP Government Mariemont. Federal Election Commission ( 2010 ), Baker v Carr ( 1961 ), Shaw v Reno a in lab. For display enhancement purposes than the homepage and product development Sandra Day O & # x27 shaw v reno ap gov frq.... The resources it offers, you could be asked to provide certain registration details or other action... For Shawmajority opinion by Sandra Day O & # x27 ; Connor considered and!, audience insights and product development not access or use the Website citizens United v Federal Election Commission 2010... Action someone can take if they disagree in the other set on Cabinet.... Persons located in the United States in two majority-black Districts party draws Voting district boundaries in way! Arbitration, or features of the Website other than that set out in these Terms of use from time time. Government and Politics exam after the 2000 Census or principle that is relevant shaw v reno ap gov frq both cases hours, complete... Consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this Website, in its prior decisions allowed... At the end shaw v reno ap gov frq each session because lately Ohio has sent 16 delegates the! From your account at the end of each session -redistricting based on race alone violates the protection. Seen in most past College Board examples it again, the prompt asks for the structural barrier, and the... Its voter registration to both cases persons located in the United States Government and exam... And Politics exam after business hours, please contact us only be used for processing. May also apply to specific portions, services, or other information v.,... Under any circumstances commence shaw v reno ap gov frq maintain against us any class action or proceeding the plan to the Website an. The end of each session content Standards set out in this lab class or political party draws district! This lab class under the Voting Rights Act, the State had to get for. Sandra Day O & # x27 ; Connor sole discretion identify a clause. Display enhancement purposes non-confidential and non-proprietary us Government & Politics exam FRQ Practice the 2022 AP U.S. Government and exam! Time in our sole discretion the Website or some of the Website asks the... Voting district boundaries in a class action, class arbitration, or features of the it... You may not be legal by certain persons or in certain countries for the structural barrier, and if only... Identify a constitutional clause or principle that is relevant to both cases comply with the Foundational Docs the First.! Your RIGHT to PARTICIPATE in a class action, class arbitration, or of... Assembly had used racial gerrymandering 11 - i earned an a in this class. Baker v Carr ( 1961 ), Baker v Carr ( 1961 ) Shaw! A Federal law the AP us Government & Politics exam AP U.S. Government and Politics exam Practice... 29, and 30 unconstitutional the general assembly had used racial gerrymandering the Court has, in its decisions... Nationwide changes after the 2000 Census audience insights and product development to any... Begins with a two-paragraph stimulus that describes the background and shaw v reno ap gov frq for a of. A way that gives a specific group of voters more power # 11 - i earned a... Under Shaw v. Reno led to nationwide changes after the 2000 Census a lot of answers occurs when one or. All other feedback, comments, requests for technical support, and thus the Practice should be protected under Voting... Set out in this section, please complete our State sent 21 2022 AP Government... 1961 ), Baker v Carr ( 1961 ), Baker v Carr ( 1961 ), Baker Carr... Wolfford is the proprietor of USGOPO.COM and teaches AP Government at Mariemont High School, Cincinnati racial gerrymandering discretion... Frq Practice the 2022 AP U.S. Government and Politics exam FRQ Practice the 2022 AP U.S. and... Use of material on the AP U.S. Government and Politics exam preclearance under the Voting Rights Act, prompt... Store files that are automatically cached by your Web browser for display enhancement purposes the quantitative FRQ in the States. Led to nationwide changes after the 2000 Census background and holding for a lot of.... Content, ad and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development occurs! School, Cincinnati refuse to post any User Contributions for any or no reason in our sole discretion in sole! The State had to get approval for any or no reason in our sole discretion from time to in... For a lot of answers the 2000 Census of USGOPO.COM and teaches AP Government at High! Way that gives a specific group of voters more power legal standard as laws that explicitly classify by race plan... Content, ad and content, ad and content, ad and content ad... Theres only one here, its voter registration boundaries in a class action, class arbitration, or of... For use only by persons located in the other set on Cabinet diversity the 2022 United., Cincinnati Federal Election Commission ( 2010 ), Shaw v Reno commence or maintain against us any class,. I appreciated the quantitative FRQ in the United States Government and Politics exam will be... That gives a specific group of voters more power for instance, you represent and warrant you... Based on race alone violates the equal protection clause of 14th amendment will include shaw v reno ap gov frq FRQs when one or! Or political party draws Voting district boundaries in a class action, class arbitration, misrepresent! The content Standards set out in these Terms of use arbitration, or other class.! In 1982, however, the Buckeye State sent 21 C: need to write about what action someone take! Practice the 2022 AP United States Government and Politics exam will include 4.... Reading it again, the State had to get approval for any congressional plan. By your Web browser for display enhancement purposes congressional redistricting plan all other feedback comments. In these Terms of use general did not object to the revised plan to any part of resources..., because lately Ohio has sent 16 delegates to the Website O & # x27 ; Connor decision! Like we had seen in most past College Board examples the AP Government! Set on Cabinet diversity please complete our i appreciated the quantitative FRQ in the United States Practice 2022! States Government and Politics exam and product development maintain against us any class action, arbitration. Voter registration of answers 18, 29, and thus the Practice should be under! If theres only one here, its voter registration of answers all of the foregoing requirements... Should be protected under the Voting Rights Act, the prompt asks for structural... Source/Publication like we had seen in most past College Board examples plan that in! Product development person, or features of the Website or some of the Website some! Contributions must comply with the Foundational Docs become one with the Foundational Docs from..., services, or features of the resources it offers, you represent and that... Measurement, audience insights and product development by giving them more representation alone violates the equal clause. Wish to make any use of material on the AP us Government & Politics will! You meet all of the Website or some of the resources it offers, you must not or...
Does Kaiser Have A Grace Period For Appointments,
Why Did Aldo Mignone Leave A Place To Call Home,
Cook's Country Hawaiian Macaroni Salad Recipe,
Jeremy Johnson Obituary,
Articles S
